Linguistic Criticism in the Heritage of Muhy al-Din Yahya Ibn Sharaf Al-Nawawi (D. 676 AH) A Critical StudyLinguistic Criticism in the Heritage of Muhy al-Din Yahya Ibn Sharaf Al-Nawawi (D. 676 AH) A Critical Study
النَّقْدُ اللُّغَوِيُّ فِي تُرَاثِ مُحِي الدِّينِ يَحيى بنِ شَرَف النَّوَوِيّ (ت676ه) دِرَاسَةٌ تَقوِيْمِيَّةٌ
| dc.contributor.advisor | أ. د. مجيد راهي الزَّامليّ | ar |
| dc.contributor.author | الرُّبيعيّ, أَحمد عيسى طاهر | ar |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-12T21:57:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | وَقَدْ بُنِيَتْ دِرَاسَتِي عَلَى خطَّةٍ قُسِّمَتْ عَلَى ثَلَاثَةِ فُصُوْلٍ يَسْبُقُهَا تَمْهِيدٌ، وَتَلحَقُهَا خَاتِمَةٌ. وَقَدْ تَنَاوَلْتُ فِي التَّمْهِيْدِ محوَرَيْنِ؛ (أَحدهما): تَرْجَمَةٌ مُوجَزَةٌ لِحَيَاةِ النَّوَوِيِّ، وَمَكَانَتِهِ العِلْمِيَّةِ. وَ(الآخَر): التَّدَاخُلُ المَعْرِفِيُّ بَيْنَ عُلُومِ العَرَبِيَّةِ وَعُلُومِ الشَّرِيعَةِ. وَخَصَّصْتُ الفَصْلَ الأَوَّلَ لِدِرَاسَةِ مَنْهَجِ النَّوَوِيِّ فِي النَّقْدِ اللُّغَوِيِّ، وَقَدْ قُسِّمَ عَلَى ثَلَاثَةِ مَباحِثَ: كَانَ الأَوَّلُ فِي مَعَايِيرِ النَّقْدِ اللُّغَوِيِّ عِنْدَ النَّوَوِيِّ، وَقَدِ اسْتَقْرَأْتُ اعْتَمِادَهُ عَلَى سَبْعَةِ مَعَايِيرَ، هِيَ: السَّمَاعُ، وَالقِيَاسُ، وَالإِجْمَاعُ، وَالاحْتِكَامُ إِلَى آرَاءِ العُلَمَاءِ وَالنَّقْلُ مِنْ كُتُبِهِمْ، وَالاشْتِقَاقُ، وَالخبْرَاتُ الشَّخْصِيَّةُ، وَالرُّؤْيَةُ وَالمُشَاهَدَةُ. وَفِي المَبْحَثِ الثَّانِي دَرَسْتُ الشَّوَاهِدَ الَّتِي أَوْرَدَهَا النَّوَوِيُّ، فِي مَوَاضِعِ النَّقْدِ اللُّغَوِيِّ، وَهِيَ: الشَّاهِدُ القُرْآنِيُّ، وَالشَّاهِدُ الحَدِيثِيُّ، وَالشَّاهِدُ الشِّعْرِيُّ. أَمَّا المَبْحَثُ الثَّالِثُ؛ فَقَدْ بَسْطْتُ فِيهِ القَوْلَ فِي أَحْكَامِ التَّقْوِيمِ اللُّغَوِيِّ عِنْدَ النَّوَوِيِّ، إِذْ كَشَفَ البَحْثُ عَنْ ثَلَاثَةِ أَنْوَاعٍ رَئِيسَةٍ مِنْ هِذِهِ الأَحْكَامِ تَتَفَرُّعُ عَلَى كُلِّ نَوْعٍ مِنْهَا جُمْلَةٌ مِنَ الأَحْكَامِ، الَّتِي أَجْرَاهَا النَّوَوِيِّ فِي مَوَاضِعَ كَثِيرَةٍ، وَمَسَائِلَ مُتَنَوِّعَةٍ؛ وَهَذِهِ الأَنْوَاعُ هِيَ: أَحْكَامُ القَبُولِ القَطْعِيَّةُ، وَأَحْكَامُ الرَّدِّ غَيْرُ القَطْعِيَّةِ، وَأَحْكَامُ الرَّدِّ القَطْعِيَّةُ. وَفِي الفَصْلِ الثَّانِي خَاضَ البَحْثُ فِي النَّقْدِ المُعْجَمِيِّ، وَالنَّقْدِ النَّحْوِيِّ فِي مُصَنَّفَاتِ النَّوَويِّ، وَأَدَرْتُ هَذَا الفَصْلَ عَلَى خَمْسَةِ مَبَاحِثَ؛ عَرَضَ الأَوَّلُ لأَثَرِ القَرِينَةِ المُعْجَمِيَّةِ فِي النَّقْدِ اللُّغَوِيِّ، وَقَدْ تَمَثَّلَتْ فِي مَظَاهِرَ عِدَّةٍ، هِيَ: ارْتِبَاطُ القَاعِدَةِ النَّحْوِيَّةِ أَوِ الصَّرْفِيَّةِ بِالمَعْنَى المُعْجَمِيِّ، وَأَثَرُ المَعْنَى المُعْجَمِيِّ فِي الإِعْرَابِ، وَالتَّضْمِينُ، وَالمُنَاسَبَةُ المُعْجَمِيَّةُ وَالمُفَارَقَةُ المُعْجَمِيَّةُ. وَاخْتَصَّ المَبْحَثُ الثَّانِي بِالنَّقْدِ فِي مَبَاحِثِ الدَّلَالَةِ؛ تَخْصِيص الدَّلَالَةِ وَتَعْمِيمهَا، وَتَغْيِير مَجَالِهَا، وَذِكْر المَعْنَى الخَاصِّ بَعْدَ العَامِّ، وَذْكْر المَعْنَى العَامِّ بَعْدَ الخَاصِّ. وَجَاءَ المَبْحَثُ الثَّالِثُ فِي النَّقْدِ الوَارِدِ فِي العَامِّيِّ، وَالمُعَرَّبِ، وَالمُوَلَّدِ مِنَ الأَلْفَاظِ. وَجُعِلَ المَبْحَثُ الرَّابِعُ لِلنَّقْدِ فِي الفِعْلِ اللَّازِمِ وَالفِعْلِ المُتَعَدِّي. فِي حِينِ عَرَضْتُ فِي المَبْحَثِ الخَامِس لِمَا قَرَّرَهُ النَّوَوِيُّ مِنْ أَحْكَامٍ نَقْدِيَّةٍ فِي بَابِ الأَسْمَاءِ المَمْنُوعَةِ مِنَ الصَّرْفِ. وَيُمَثِّلُ الفَصْلُ الثَّالِثُ ذِرْوَةَ سَنَامِ هَذِهِ الأُطْرُوحَةِ؛ لِكَوْنِهِ خُصِّصَ لِدِرَاسَةِ النَّقْدِ فِي أَبْوَابِ عِلْمِ الصَّرْفِ، وَمَسَائِلِهِ، الوَارِدِ فِي تُرَاثِ النَّوَوِيِّ؛ إِذْ كَثُرَ النَّقْدُ فِي هَذَا المَجَالِ، وَاخْتَلَفَتْ مَظَاهِرُهُ، وَتَنَوَّعَتْ أَمْثِلَتُهُ؛ فَاقْتَضَى ذَلِكَ أَنْ يُقَسَّمَ هَذَا الفَصْلُ عَلَى خَمْسَةِ مَبَاحِثَ، تَنَاوَلْتُ فِي أَوَّلِهَا النَّقْدَ فِي صِيَغِ المُفْرَدِ، وَالجَمْعِ مِنَ الأَسْمَاءِ، وَقَدْ جَاءَتْ غَالِبُ النُّقُودِ – فِي مَبْحَثِ الجَمْعِ – فِي صِيَغِ جَمْعِ التَّكْسِيرِ. وَعَالَجَ المَبْحَثُ الثَّانِي النَّقْدَ اللُّغَوِيَّ الوَارِدَ فِي بَابِ المُذَكَّرِ وَالمُؤَنَّثِ. وَكَانَ لِلنَّقْدِ الوَارِدِ فِي بَابِ النَّسَبِ نَصِيبٌ مِنْ هَذِهِ الدِّرَاسَةِ، فَاسْتَأْثَرَ بِالمَبْحَثِ الثَّالِثِ. وَقَدْ رَصَدَ النّوَوِيُّ جُمْلَةً مِنَ الأَفْعَالِ الَّتِي صَحَّحَ فِيهَا تَعَاقُبَ صِيغَتَي (فَعَل، وَأَفْعَل)، أَوْ خَطَّأَهُ؛ فَكَانَ المَبْحَثُ الرَّابِعُ فِي الوُقُوفِ عَلَى أَحْكَامِهِ فِي هَذَا البَابِ؛ تَحْلِيلًا وَتَقْوِيمًا. وَأَمَّا المَبْحَثُ الخَامِسُ، فَقَدِ انْثَنَيْتُ فِيهِ لِأَدْرُسَ مَظَاهِرَ النَّقْدِ اللُّغَوِيِّ، الَّتِي جَاءَتْ فِي بَابَي القَلْبِ المَكَانِيِّ، وَالإِبْدَالِ اللُّغَوِيِّ. وَفِي الخَاتِمَةُ دَوَّنْتُ مَا تَوَصَّلَتْ إِلَيْهِ هَذِهِ الدِّرَاسَةُ مِنْ نَتَائِجَ مُهِمَّةٍ جَدِيرَةٍ بالتَّنْوِيهِ بِهَا، وَإِثْبَاتِهَا، مُخْتَصِرًا ذَلِكَ فِي نقَاطٍ مُحَدَّدَةٍ. | ar |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | This study examines a prominent linguistic phenomenon in the literary heritage of a distinguished encyclopaedic scholar, who wrote on various subjects, namely Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi (D. 676 AH). The phenomenon in question is the prevalence of linguistic criticism throughout his works; as his linguistic evaluations accompanied his studies of the Arabic language, its diverse issues and its dialects. This is a phenomenon worthy of study, research and evaluation. The nature of this study has necessitated its division into three chapters, preceded by an introduction and followed by a conclusion. The introduction focuses on two main themes: a general overview of al-Nawawi’s life and his scholarly standing, and the intellectual interplay between Arabic studies and Islamic jurisprudence. The first chapter deals with al-Nawawi’s approach to linguistic criticism and is divided into three sections: Section One: the criteria of linguistic criticism according to al-Nawawi. The second section: Al-Nawawi’s evidence in linguistic criticism. The third section: the rules of linguistic evaluation according to Al-Nawawi. The second chapter dealt with lexical criticism and grammatical criticism, and was divided into five sections: The first section examines the influence of lexical context in linguistic criticism. The second section deals with semantics. The third section deals with colloquial, Arabized and neologism. The fourth section deals with intransitive and transitive verbs. The fifth section investigates the diptote. As for the third chapter, it dealt with morphological analysis and was divided into five sections. The first section deals with the singular and the plural. The second section deals with masculine and feminine. The third section deals with Nisba. The fourth section deals with the forms (faʿala and afʿala). The fifth section deals with metathesis and substitution. Then there is the conclusion, which summarizes the most important findings of the research, condensed into specific points. As for the methodology the researcher have followed in this study and in the presentation of the texts, it is an approach based on description, analysis, followed by critical evaluation in accordance with the critical compiler, especially in his judgments, rThis study examines a prominent linguistic phenomenon in the literary heritage of a distinguished encyclopaedic scholar, who wrote on various subjects, namely Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi (D. 676 AH). The phenomenon in question is the prevalence of linguistic criticism throughout his works; as his linguistic evaluations accompanied his studies of the Arabic language, its diverse issues and its dialects. This is a phenomenon worthy of study, research and evaluation. The nature of this study has necessitated its division into three chapters, preceded by an introduction and followed by a conclusion. The introduction focuses on two main themes: a general overview of al-Nawawi’s life and his scholarly standing, and the intellectual interplay between Arabic studies and Islamic jurisprudence. The first chapter deals with al-Nawawi’s approach to linguistic criticism and is divided into three sections: Section One: the criteria of linguistic criticism according to al-Nawawi. The second section: Al-Nawawi’s evidence in linguistic criticism. The third section: the rules of linguistic evaluation according to Al-Nawawi. The second chapter dealt with lexical criticism and grammatical criticism, and was divided into five sections: The first section examines the influence of lexical context in linguistic criticism. The second section deals with semantics. The third section deals with colloquial, Arabized and neologism. The fourth section deals with intransitive and transitive verbs. The fifth section investigates the diptote. As for the third chapter, it dealt with morphological analysis and was divided into five sections. The first section deals with the singular and the plural. The second section deals with masculine and feminine. The third section deals with Nisba. The fourth section deals with the forms (faʿala and afʿala). The fifth section deals with metathesis and substitution. Then there is the conclusion, which summarizes the most important findings of the research, condensed into specific points. As for the methodology the researcher have followed in this study and in the presentation of the texts, it is an approach based on description, analysis, followed by critical evaluation in accordance with the critical compiler, especially in his judgments, responses and objections, where feasible. esponses and objections, where feasible. | en |
| dc.format.medium | ETD | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.31185/uowasit-34 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.uowasit.edu.iq/handle/123456789/190 | |
| dc.language.iso | ar | en |
| dc.publisher | Wasit University | en |
| dc.title | النَّقْدُ اللُّغَوِيُّ فِي تُرَاثِ مُحِي الدِّينِ يَحيى بنِ شَرَف النَّوَوِيّ (ت676ه) دِرَاسَةٌ تَقوِيْمِيَّةٌ | ar |
| dc.title.alternative | Linguistic Criticism in the Heritage of Muhy al-Din Yahya Ibn Sharaf Al-Nawawi (D. 676 AH) A Critical StudyLinguistic Criticism in the Heritage of Muhy al-Din Yahya Ibn Sharaf Al-Nawawi (D. 676 AH) A Critical Study | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | en |
| thesis.degree.discipline | قسم اللغة العربية | ar |
| thesis.degree.grantor | جامعة واسط | ar |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en |
| thesis.degree.name | دكتوراه | ar |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- أَحمد عيسى طاهر الرُّبيعيّ.pdf
- Size:
- 5.76 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format